Sagay, a Senior advocate of Nigeria, has mentioned that Buhari would no longer be cowed by using the Senate’s motion which he described as an affront to the Presidency.
He said, “That motion is infantile and irresponsible. Do they believe Buhari is a person that may easily be threatened? My God! How can folks of such personality occupy the very best legislative place of job in the us of a? Nigeria is completed.
“it is a great mistake and they are going to remorseful about it.”
When requested what acceptable motion Buhari may take, Sagay explained that Buhari could proceed to appoint folks in appearing capability the place essential.
He said the refusal to verify the RECs was once of no impact since officers of the INEC had been acting as RECs for over a 12 months.
Sagay brought, “where the Senate is required to approve an individual for a particular position and they refuse to do it, the individual might continue to act depending on the nature of the appointment.
“on the other hand, if the nominee is coming from every other sector, just like in the case of the RECs, it approach they can not act. on the other hand, people below that rank in INEC can proceed to behave as RECs all over the country because it has been accomplished.”
He introduced, “What this action means is that the Senate is being occupied by way of probably the most unserious set of Nigerians in historical past. Nigeria is currently at its lowest stage because we’ve people who have no experience of responsibility, who have no feeling and are there for simply vanity and are able to bring down the country so as to feel essential, it is the worst case of abuse ever.
“allow them to do what they want, they’ll feel sorry about it.”
Senate motion quantities to blackmail, arm-twisting –SANs
also,a former Chairman, Lagos branch of the Nigerian Bar association, Mr. Chijioke Okoli (SAN), mentioned the decision by the Senate amounted to a blackmail of the Presidency.
“after they now say that they might now not do one thing apart from certain things are finished quantities to blackmail and straying into judicial operate,” Okoli advised one in every of our correspondents on the telephone on Tuesday.
Okoli stated that the refusal to display the RECs except for the President sacked the Magu constituted an act of legislative impertinence.
He mentioned the legislature lacked the facility to compel the executive to sack an appointee, including that the Senate’s habits in the contemporary earlier might be described as a clog within the wheel of democracy.
He stated, “i’ll say that the Senate, with all due experience of accountability and as a senior member of the bar and a pace-setter locally that the Senate is making itself, wittingly or otherwise, a cog within the wheel of our democratic process.
“Their (participants) behavior, especially on this eighth Senate, via and large, especially in the previous couple of months, does no longer recommend the presence of sagacity and wisdom that in most cases must be expected from a legislative chamber that’s traditionally presupposed to be comprised through very smart persons.
“there has been a demanding lack of restraint in the usage of their powers. even if we say lawyers in the Senate aren’t in observe, they may be able to, at absolute best, in the event that they so want, provide steerage.
“For the Senate to come back out brazenly to inform the President that he must sack Magu, for me, is legislative impertinence.
“In my own view, they have got achieved their duties, rightly or wrongly, whether or not or not to verify Magu, it does not lie with them to inform the President who to sack or to not sack.
“the one power acknowledged by using the structure to make such definitive pronouncement would be the court docket of law.
“in a single moment, they transfer from their position as legislators to the realm of the judiciary and in addition somersault their approach into the area of government powers.”
In his reaction, another Senior suggest of Nigeria, Emega Ngige, mentioned the motion of the Senate seemed to be supposed to arm-twist the Presidency.
Urging the Presidency to consider the grievances of the Senate towards Magu, the prison practitioner delivered that the constitution was silent on whether or not the Senate had the constitutional power to pressurise the Presidency on Magu or now not.
He mentioned, “What the Senate has carried out is a demonstration geared toward fingers-twisting the President. the issue they (participants) raised must be thought to be by using the Presidency.
“So, you can’t say it’s not constitutional or it’s. The importance of RECs confirmation can’t be over-emphasised and that i wish that the Senate does no longer tie that confirmation to Magu.”